‘They teach you how to get into that mindset but not out of
it’
A conversation I had with an actor a few weeks ago has
really stuck with me. Whether it’s as a writer, actor, director or anyone else
associated with making theatre (and other work). You naturally absorb some of
what you’re working on.
You need to be a certain kind of empath to do some of this
work, and that has an impact. That doesn’t mean going scary Daniel Day Lewis levels
of ‘method’ (hey whatever works for you boo but you probably don’t need to go
and live in the mountains for 3 months unless you’re Bear Grylls). But it does
mean whether writer, actor, director or whoever a certain level of being ‘in it’
with whatever the story is. And while we’re keen to praise actors and writers who
‘go there’ to tell a particular kind of story (and directors et al who get them
there), we don’t really talk about what happens after- the mental health impact,
the fact those stories ‘stay with you’ sometimes. And how you cope while you’re
doing it even.
Getting ‘to’ or ‘in’ that frame of mind is actually the ‘easy’
part. Actors are taught tools for that. Directors techniques for developing that.
Writers…we largely stumble our way into it, and how we ‘experience’ it is
likely fairly personal. For me I always feel like my characters are friends I’m
watching go through whatever it is. Without wanting to get too ‘writer wanker’
they kind of largely dictate their own story, after I’ve done the ‘groundwork’
of research and planning. So, I end up sitting with it all in my head for some time
before the characters eventually ‘tell me’ the story and it’s on the page.
Getting there then in some respects is the easy part. It’s what you do with all
that information, and all the emotional fallout after. And for writers, who
usually sit with it for far longer than anyone else, when it’s been there for
so long, how you learn to let it go- or at least file it away, while preserving
your own mental health is a tough one.
I blogged the whole process of my play- writing to
production- but I haven’t been able to write about the actual production, or
the aftermath. Partly because I couldn’t quite formulate anything to say.
Partly because the aftermath of it hit me hard.
The weeks after the play was on were a fairly dark one
mentally. It was in part yes, an exhaustion element, adrenaline crash, call it
whatever you like of it being ‘over’. The time a play is on is mentally
exhausting- the act of doing it is terrifying. It’s the contents of your brain
laid bare for people to judge after all. And then it’s over and the world moves
on. And after something you’ve put months, sometimes years into- of pouring everything
into a project, one with many a setback and ups and downs, there’s bound to
be a moment of ‘fallout’ or a ‘crash’. And we need to prepare ourselves better-
and support one another.
But equally there’s seeing that world you ‘lived in’ in your
head alive again that affects you. Watching the piece, talking about the piece
again, you end up with the swirling mass of stories inside your head again. And
unlike acting where to a degree you can come up with the artificial division of
‘onstage and off’ there’s not the same ‘off switch’.
My play was about some pretty serious subject matter. Some
pretty emotive stuff. And while I’ve gotten something of a reputation for being
the go-to for matter- of- fact -chatter about death, and a weird niche knowledge
of funeral practices and etiquette (Undertaker YouTube my friends, Undertaker YouTube).
All that comes from a place of a need to tell those stories. And that need
comes from a place of those things affecting you in one way or another. And
there’s not necessarily and off switch for that that comes easily. And I found
that hard after this most recent project. In part as well, some unfortunate
real-life coinciding with themes in the play- old and new wounds being opened. And
we shouldn’t discount that- the real world continues, the things that perhaps
inspired the writing to begin with continue- whether that’s political chaos or
cancer, those things will continue to exist in the ‘real world’ and perhaps cut
deeper for a time, having spent so much time ‘in it’. For me it was a friend
losing a relative to cancer, the anniversary of my own father’s death (which I never
normally remember let alone mark), a chronic illness flare (probably brought on
by stress, but a reminder of feeling like I too was dying exactly five years
before). And who knows what else. For about three weeks it felt like I was
under a cloud. And trying to take a break between projects, being creatively
burnt out, meant I had nowhere to ‘put’ any of that emotion. Again, we learn
how to get into it…but not back out again.
You have to put yourself in that headspace, whatever part of
the process you belong to, to different degrees, in different ways and for
different lengths of time. Being naturally empaths as writers (most of us)
those things hit us. All this came together for me because of the place of ‘ripping
open’ those elements, those places I’d needed to ‘go to’ in order to write the
thing. Because again as ‘artists’ of whatever kind we need to go to those
places mentally to make the work. But coming back from them we’re sort of left
alone. And it’s a thing we don’t talk about often enough. We talk about the
mental health impact of the ‘industry’ side of things. Of rejections, and body
image, competitiveness, insecurity. And it’s vital we do. But we forget to talk
about the impact of the work itself. Of what telling these stories does to you.
Ultimately, I ran a half marathon and that half ‘fixed me’ then
I got properly ill for a week, and then I picked myself up again and moved onto
the next project. None of which is a proper way of dealing with the mental health
impact of a big project but we all do what we do. But we should as a
collective, as an industry be taking all this more seriously.
And as a footnote, it’s not only the ‘creatives’ in the traditional
sense. And I’m not sure where this fits in, but I know in my academic work, in
absorbing myself in the world of the AIDS crisis, that history, those
narratives, people’s stories…I get the same way. Over the last few years, talking
t a few people who have worked on these plays, they say the same thing- it gets
under your skin, it affects you. And that’s just my corner of the sky, it’s no
doubt the same in other pockets of similarly themed work and history. To do it
right we have to be passionate about it, invested in it. But we should also be
aware about the impact it has. I feel in my little ‘AIDS theatre’ niche part of
a weird club, a little like AA in that we only know what that particular feeling
is like- it’s like a historical weight of responsibility and grief. And that’s
an interesting headspace to be in. And a fairly niche one.
I remember reading in a book as a kid something along the
lines of ‘to make something good you have to give a piece of yourself away and
never give it back’ I still believe in that. But I think we all need to get
better at putting ourselves back together.